The United States federal government operates border preclearance facilities at a number of ports and airports in foreign territory. They are staffed and operated by U.S. Customs and Border Protection officers. Travelers pass through U.S. Immigration and Customs, Public Health, and Agriculture inspections before boarding their aircraft, ship, or train. This process is intended to streamline border procedures, reduce congestion at ports of entry, and facilitate travel between the preclearance location and U.S. airports unequipped to handle international travelers.
Preclearance exists at most major Canadian airports. Arrangements also exist with some airports in Bermuda, The Bahamas, Aruba, the Republic of Ireland, and the United Arab Emirates. Passengers traveling from a preclearance port arrive in the United States as domestic travelers, but are still subject to reinspection at the discretion of Customs and Border Protection.
Preclearance applies to U.S. citizens as well as citizens of most other countries who travel to the United States. As U.S. and Canadian laws require those in transit to pass through customs (unlike many other countries, which permit airside transfers), preclearance also applies to transit passengers.
Video United States border preclearance
Reasons for implementation
This process is intended to streamline border procedures, reduce congestion at ports of entry, and facilitate travel between the preclearance location and some U.S. airports that may not be equipped to otherwise handle international travelers. With the exceptions of LaGuardia and Ronald Reagan Washington National Airport, however, many more U.S. airports now have customs facilities than when the preclearance program first started in 1952.
The United States and other countries that allow preclearance have been accused of being motivated also by the desire to prevent the arrival of asylum seekers, who are otherwise protected under the 1951 Refugee Convention's non-refoulement provisions once they arrive at their destination.
Maps United States border preclearance
Benefits and drawbacks
Preclearance is particularly beneficial to those who have an ongoing connection (such as a connecting flight) upon arrival in the US, as there is no risk of border delays causing them to miss such connection. (A corresponding drawback, however, is that a delay in preclearance could cause the passenger to miss the outbound flight.) Air travelers with further connections have their baggage checked through to their destination; without preclearance, the baggage would have to be collected prior to customs inspection and then rechecked onto the subsequent flight.
Another advantage is that CBP officers are able to ultimately exclude inadmissible passengers and prohibited goods before a flight, train journey, or voyage commences. This saves CBP the hassle of dealing with them on US soil thus helping minimise the risk of any untoward incident happening there. As such, when a person is denied entry into the United States, he or she is not allowed to board the plane and has to merely leave the airport and go home instead of being put in a returning flight (unless the passenger arrived at the preclearance airport from an earlier flight).
Preclearance also provides considerable flexibility to the airlines operating in those routes where such a program is available. For example, major U.S airlines and their subsidiaries routinely operate many daily flights from locations like Toronto or Nassau to New York City. Thanks to the presence of preclearance facilities in Toronto and Nassau, the airlines can choose to conveniently direct their flights from these locations to land at LaGuardia Airport (which has no border protection facilities) instead of John F. Kennedy International Airport or Newark Liberty International Airport. This allows them to save the valuable space at JFK and EWR for their other international arrivals.
Preclearance exists at most major Canadian airports, theoretically enabling more convenient travel from those cities to the United States. The waits at some busy preclearance facilities, notably Toronto Pearson, can often exceed the waiting times of nonprecleared flights at the destination and cause significant delays to departure schedules. With the notable exceptions of LaGuardia and Ronald Reagan Washington National Airport, many more U.S. airports now have customs facilities compared to when the preclearance program first started in 1952. Reduced staffing levels by U.S. Customs and Border Protection have been blamed by airport authorities, whose pleas have been answered with deferrals due to domestic priorities. NEXUS and similar programs are now being explored and expanded as a means to try to restore some of the original convenience to the preclearance process.
Legal restrictions
Preclearance facilities exist because of agreements made between the U.S. federal government and the governments of the host countries. Travelers who have passed through the U.S. government checks, but whose flight or ship has not departed, remain in the legal jurisdiction of the host country. U.S. officials may question and search travelers with the passenger's permission, but they do not have powers of arrest (either for customs or immigration violations, or for the execution of outstanding warrants), although they can deny boarding. Local criminal laws apply, and are enforced by local officials. Some countries have laws in place specifically to cover preclearance issues. Since CBP does not have legal powers on foreign soil, passengers can only be detained for local laws by local authorities. A passenger can choose to abandon their flight and refuse search, and unlike in the United States, officers cannot search them. Most preclearance facilities have a sign explaining this. CBP Officers in the Preclearance Division are not armed while on foreign soil. Although, it is likely that, if the Canadian Parliament approves Bill C-23, U.S. Customs officers would be allowed to carry sidearms while on duty in Canada, if they're working in an environment where Canada Border Services Agency officers are normally armed.
Canada
Informal preclearance arrangements between the United States and Canada began at Toronto Pearson International Airport in 1952, following a request from American Airlines. This was extended and formalized with Canada's passage of the Air Transport Preclearance Act in 1974, the 1999 Preclearance Act, and with the 2001 Canada-U.S. Agreement on Air Transport Preclearance. The preclearance agreement is fully reciprocal, meaning the government of Canada has the option of opening Canadian Preclearance facilities in the United States. On average, however, U.S. international airports offer far fewer flights to Canada compared to the reverse, making this an expensive and inefficient proposition that, as of 2016, has not been exercised by the Canadian government.
The following Canadian airports operate U.S. preclearance facilities:
- Calgary International Airport
- Edmonton International Airport
- Halifax Stanfield International Airport
- Montréal-Pierre Elliott Trudeau International Airport
- Ottawa Macdonald-Cartier International Airport
- Toronto Pearson International Airport
- Vancouver International Airport
- Winnipeg James Armstrong Richardson International Airport
The United States operates a preclearance post at Pacific Central Station for Amtrak Cascades rail service between Vancouver, British Columbia, and Seattle, Washington.
The United States operates a preclearance post at the port of Vancouver. This is particularly valuable to travelers using cruise liners that visit Alaska or that depart from Vancouver and have a first stop at U.S. cities situated along the west coast of North America.
The United States operates immigration-only preinspection posts (customs is still performed upon arrival in the United States) at the port of Victoria for both the Black Ball Line MV Coho car ferry service to Port Angeles, Washington and the Victoria Clipper passenger-only ferry to Seattle, Washington, and at the terminal in Sidney for the Washington State Ferries service to Anacortes, Washington.
Per the request of Porter Airlines, a new terminal building at Billy Bishop Toronto City Airport (Toronto island) officially opened in Fall 2010 and includes both Canada Border Services Agency and provisions for U.S. Customs and Border Protection border preclearance facilities. The latter was, however, denied by Washington at the time.
In May 2012, U.S. Senators Charles Schumer, Kirsten Gillibrand, Patrick Leahy, and Bernie Sanders sent a letter to President Barack Obama urging him to fast track the approval of a preclearance facility in Montreal's Central Station, which will prevent U.S.-bound travelers from having to stop at the train station in Rouses Point, New York for immigration and customs checks whenever they cross the Canada-U.S. border. On March 16, 2015, the United States and Canada signed an agreement that would allow for such a facility.
On March 16, 2015, U.S. and Canadian officials signed the ministerial-level Agreement on Land, Rail, Marine, and Air Transport Preclearance Between the Government of the United States of America and the Government of Canada, which foresees significant expansion of the scope of preclearance facilities. For instance, under the new agreement, U.S. CBP officers working at U.S. preclearance facilities in Canada will be able to carry firearms.
On March 10, 2016, U.S. and Canadian officials announced that preclearance would become available at Billy Bishop Toronto City Airport, Québec City Jean Lesage International Airport, and Montreal Central Station. The necessary upgrades in Quebec City will take 18 months and $35 million CAD to complete.
On December 8, 2016, then-US President Barack Obama signed a bipartisan bicameral legislation to give legal effect to Congressional legislation enabling US-Canada preclearance. On December 12th 2017, Canada's Governor General gave a royal assent to Bill C-23 that has sailed through both the House and the Senate. The only hurdles standing in the way of implementing a preclearance regime are orders-in-council (="executive order") in Canada, a joint agreement between Trump and Trudeau, and an official presidential proclamation for it to finally take effect.
Caribbean and Atlantic Ocean
Informal preclearance with Bermuda began in 1960. The Bahamas and the United States signed a treaty in June 1974 formalizing the process.
- Aruba: Queen Beatrix International Airport
- Bahamas: Grand Bahama International Airport in Freeport
- Bahamas: Lynden Pindling International Airport in Nassau
- Bermuda: Bermuda International Airport
Plans were underway for a preclearance facility to be opened at Punta Cana International Airport, located in the popular tourist destination of Punta Cana, Dominican Republic by the end of summer 2009. As of January 2014, however, the facility has not opened yet. In April 2011, a team from the U.S. Department of Homeland Security traveled to Jamaica for talks with Jamaican government and tourism officials on opening future preclearance facilities on the island. In April 2016, plans were announced to open the preclearance facility by May 2017.
Republic of Ireland
- Dublin Airport
- Shannon Airport
The United States and the Republic of Ireland entered into a preinspection arrangement in 1986. Shannon Airport initially offered only immigration checks, with customs and agriculture inspections done on arrival in the United States--a procedure more properly known as preinspection. In August 2009, Shannon opened an addition to its preclearance facility that provided customs and agriculture inspections. The facilities at Dublin Airport, like those at Shannon, initially offered only immigration checks on select flights. In January 2011, a section of the recently opened Terminal 2 dedicated to preclearance opened with full CBP facilities. Both airports now allow U.S.-bound commercial flights that use the preclearance facilities to arrive at domestic terminals instead of international terminals, which in turn allows arriving passengers to leave airports upon landing without further inspection. Since March 2010, the Shannon preclearance facility is also available for use by private aircraft; the Dublin facility is only available for commercial flights. Following Executive Order 13769, which introduced a ban on passport-holders of seven countries traveling to the United States, the Irish government announced that there would be a "complete review" of preclearance arrangements.
Middle East
- Abu Dhabi International Airport
In December 2011, the government of Abu Dhabi signed a letter of intent to construct a terminal that, when opened, would house a U.S. border preclearance facility. On June 6, 2013, the House passed an amendment offered by Representatives Pat Meehan (R-PA), Candice Miller (R-MI) and Peter DeFazio (D-OR), which prohibits the U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) from using any taxpayer dollars to conduct customs and border protection (CBP) preclearance operations at Abu Dhabi International Airport (AUH). The amendment was unanimously adopted during floor consideration of the FY14 Homeland Security Appropriations bill. The U.S. customs pre-clearance facility at Abu Dhabi International Airport officially opened on January 26, 2014. U.S. customs preclearance is currently being planned at Dubai International Airport.
On November 14, 2013, Rep. Patrick Meehan (R, PA-7) introduced the Preclearance Authorization Act of 2014 (H.R. 3488; 113th Congress), which would authorize the United States Secretary of Homeland Security (DHS) to establish preclearance facilities, conduct preclearance operations, or provide customs services outside of the United States to prevent terrorists, terrorist instruments, and other national security threats from gaining access to the United States. Meehan indicated that the goal of the bill is to prevent the Customs Bureau from opening a pre-clearance facility at Abu Dhabi International Airport in the United Arab Emirates. Currently just one airline flies from Abu Dhabi to the United States: Etihad, a state-run airline. Supporters of the bill wish to avoid giving Etihad an unfair competitive advantage created by travelers flying through that Abu Dhabi being able to use preclearance, an opportunity passengers on other airlines would not have.
Future plans
On March 16, 2015, the United States and Canada signed an agreement to construct a preclearance facility at Montreal Central Station. The facility will eliminate a border stop for Amtrak's Adirondack service and support a future extension of the Vermonter to Montreal.
In May 2015, the United States Department of Homeland Security announced that the following airports will be considered for the expansion of border preclearance scheme:
- Brussels Airport, Belgium
- Punta Cana Airport, Dominican Republic
- Narita International Airport, Japan
- Amsterdam Airport Schiphol, Netherlands
- Oslo Airport, Norway
- Madrid-Barajas Airport, Spain
- Stockholm Arlanda Airport, Sweden
- Istanbul Ataturk Airport, Turkey
- London Heathrow Airport
- Manchester Airport, United Kingdom.
On November 4, 2016, Sweden and the United States signed an agreement that would make Sweden the second European country, after the Republic of Ireland, to offer preclearance, although no announcement has been made as to when the service will start. November 4, 2016 was also the date of a DHS announcement that eleven more airports in nine countries had been added to the list of possible preclearance airports:
- El Dorado International Airport (BOG) in Bogota, Colombia
- Ministro Pistarini International Airport (EZE) in Buenos Aires, Argentina
- Edinburgh Airport (EDI) in Edinburgh, United Kingdom
- Keflavik International Airport (KEF) in Iceland
- Mexico City International Airport (MEX) in Mexico City, Mexico
- Milan-Malpensa Airport (MXP) in Milan, Italy
- Kansai International Airport (KIX) in Osaka, Japan
- Rio de Janeiro-Galeão International Airport (GIG) in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
- Leonardo da Vinci-Fiumicino Airport (FCO) in Rome, Italy
- São Paulo-Guarulhos International Airport (GRU) in São Paulo, Brazil
- Princess Juliana International Airport (SXM) in St. Maarten.
Aborted plans
Ministry of Foreign Affairs of South Korea stated that the government of South Korea plans to establish the U.S. preclearance system at Incheon International Airport. On January 15, 2015, however, Incheon International Airport announced that it would not introduce the U.S. preclearance after an in-depth analysis concluded that U.S. preclearance could lead to decreased sales at duty-free shops, despite the potential income from usage fees remitted for the use of preclearance space.
On May 23, 2015, an unofficial member of the Executive Council of Hong Kong, Regina Ip, revealed in an interview that the United States and Hong Kong had explored the possibilities "some 20 or 30 years ago" to set up the preclearance arrangements at Kai Tak Airport. According to Ip, she was dispatched by the Secretary for Security, in her capacity as a career civil servant in the Security Branch, to study the arrangements in Canada, but the plan was subsequently shelved because of room constraints at Kai Tak.
On February 1, 2017, the Netherlands pulled out of talks with the United States to set up a pre-clearance program at Amsterdam Airport Schiphol because of U.S. President Donald Trump's Executive Order 13769, which banned travel to the United States by citizens of certain countries.
See also
- Extraterritorial jurisdiction
- Immigration to the United States
- List of United States immigration legislation
- United States Department of Homeland Security
- United States Citizenship and Immigration Services
- Juxtaposed controls (a similar arrangement between Belgium, France and the UK to carry out pre-embarkation immigration checks)
- Woodlands Train Checkpoint (a similar arrangement where Malaysian inbound immigration checks are carried out at the station in Singapore prior to boarding)
References
External links
- Preclearance Locations, U.S. Customs and Border Protection
- Preclearance at Toronto Pearson: A Vital Link Connecting the U.S. and Canada
- Preclearance - map of airports that have it (eSpatial interactive map)
Source of article : Wikipedia
0 Comments